Performance Score
The company appears mature in various aspects: ambition of medium-term objectives, supplier engagement policy, transition management, compatibility of business models in a low-carbon world.However, significant areas for improvement have been identified: granular monitoring of emissions by product type, energy efficiency management and public activities.
Narrative Score
The strengths and areas for improvement offset each other to result in an average rating.Thus, the company has identified business models compatible with a low-carbon world and the past trend in reducing emissions is good.However, the rise of these business models is not the subject of detailed publications and there is no prospective element allowing a reliable future trend to be constructed.The presence of controversies relating to PFAS without identification of a strong response (reduction) penalizes the company's rating on reputation aspects.The risk analysis carried out by the company integrates various relevant risks, particularly relating to flurated gases.Certain potentially relevant risks (in particular availability and sufficiency of bio-sourced/recycled inputs)
Trend score
Positive elements are identified, in particular the efforts made to define the modalities for implementing a carbon neutrality objective in 2050.However, the absence of detailed prospective information and the uncertainties associated with future emissions trends given that the decrease in emissions in 2023 compared to 2022 seems mainly linked to a potentially temporary decrease in production lead to proposing a trend "=".
ℹ️